摘要
Background: The safety and efficacy of pulmonary thromboendarterectomy (PTE) surgery after COVID-19 infection is unknown. Objective(s): Assess the outcomes of PTE in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) who had COVID-19 infection. Method(s): Retrospective, chart review of PTE cases at UCSD from March 2020 through December 2021. Result(s): 315 patients underwent PTE surgery during the analysis period;23 cases (7.3%) had previous COVID-19 infection. All were asymptomatic from COVID-19 infection at time of surgery. Mean age was 46 (range 16-75;mean 55 for non-COVID group), 13 women, 10 men, mean BMI 34.8 +/- 8.1 (mean 30.7 +/- 7.5 non-COVID). 12 patients (52.2%) were on PH targeted therapy (50.5% non-COVID). Preoperative PVR was 479.2 +/- 288.4 dynes s cm (536.6 +/- 353.7 dynes s cm non-COVID);postoperative PVR was 192.7 +/- 77.1 dynes s cm (216.6 +/- 105.6 dynes s cm non-COVID). Average circulatory arrest time was 40.3 +/- 17.9 minutes (45.3 +/- 19.7 minutes non-COVID, p=0.2), with majority of cases having Level 2 UCSD surgical classification. Average ventilator time was 1.9 days (2.2 days non-COVID, p=0.7), ICU stay 4.4 days (4.4 days non-COVID, p=1.0), length of hospitalization 10.9 days (11.6 days non-COVID, p=0.4). There was 1 case (4.3%) of airway hemorrhage, 3 cases (13.0%) of reperfusion lung injury, and 2 cases (8.7%) of post-operative respiratory infection. 10 patients (43.5%) were discharged on supplemental oxygen (60.0% for non-COVID). There were no in-hospital deaths. Compared with cases operated without COVID-19 infection over the same time period, no major differences were observed. Conclusion(s): History of COVID-19 infection did not affect outcomes of PTE surgery.
摘要
Introduction: Pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) is the recommended treatment for patients with operable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). Reducing PVR pre-surgery may lower the surgical risk, but efficacy of drug treatment in operable CTEPH has not yet been proven and surgeons are concerned that dissection may be more difficult in pre-treated patients. Methodology: A randomised, double-blind, placebo controlled, multinational prospective study was performed in patients with operable CTEPH and PVR >800 dynes.sec.cm-5 at baseline (NCT03273257). Patients were randomised to Riociguat or placebo for 3 months prior to PEA. Primary endpoint was the change in PVR from baseline to before PEA. Secondary endpoints included perioperative findings and evaluation of the PEA specimen. Planned recruitment was 88 patients over 2 years. Result(s): The study was terminated early because of slow recruitment and the COVID-19 pandemic. At the time of study cessation, 14 patients were randomised (7 in each group) and 11 patients completed PEA surgery. At diagnosis, PVR was 944.0 dynes.sec.cm-5 in the Riociguat group and 1007.5 dynes.sec.cm-5 in the control group. -5 -5 The mean change in PVR prior to PEA was -28.4% for Riociguat and -6.9% for placebo (p=0.14). Completeness of surgical clearance was as expected in all patients. In the Riociguat group ease of dissection plane was rated as easier in 1, normal in 3 and more difficult in 2. In the control group, it was rated as easier in 1 and normal in 4. There were no surgical complications or post-operative deaths and no new safety signals. Conclusion(s): Due to the premature study discontinuation and the limited sample size, we are unable to determine the impact of bridging therapy on PEA outcomes.
摘要
Background. Although COVID-19 is a viral infection, it is known that antibiotics are often prescribed due to concerns about combined bacterial infection. Therefore, we aimed to analyze how many patients with COVID-19 received the antibiotic prescription as well as what kinds of factors contributed to it using the National Health Insurance database. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed claims data for adults 19 years of age and older hospitalized for COVID-19 from December 1, 2019 to December 31, 2020. According to severity classification of the National Institutes of Health guidelines, we calculated not only the proportion of patients receiving antibiotics but also days of treatment per 1000 patient days. In addition, we investigated the factors contributing to antibiotic use by linear regression analysis. Results. Of the 55,228 patients, 47% were male, 55% were older than 50 years of age, and most patients (89%) had no underlying diseases. The majority (84%, 46,576) were classified as having mild to moderate illness, with 11% (6,168) and 5% (2,484) having severe and critical, respectively. Antibiotics were prescribed in a total of 27% (15,081). While 74% of patients with severe illness and 88% of those with critical illness received antibiotic treatment, even 18% of mild to moderate cases were prescribed antibiotics. Fluoroquinolones were the most commonly prescribed antibiotics (8,348), followed by third generation cephalosporins (5,729) and beta-lactam/betalactamase inhibitors (3,822) as shown in Figure 1. Older age, severity of disease and underlying medical conditions contributed to overall prescription rates as well as days of antibiotic use significantly (Table 1). Conclusion. Although most of COVID-19 patients had mild to moderate illness, more than a quarter were prescribed antibiotics. Judicious use of broad-spectrum antibiotics is necessary for COVID-19 patients, considering the severity of disease and the risk of bacterial co-infection.
摘要
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the relative and independent contributions of impaired metabolic health and obesity to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outcomes. METHODS: We analyzed 4,069 COVID-19 patients between January and June 2020 in South Korea, classified into four groups according to metabolic health status and body mass index (BMI): metabolically healthy normal weight (MHNW), metabolically unhealthy normal weight (MUNW), metabolically healthy obese (MHO), and metabolically unhealthy obese (MUO). The primary outcome was a composite of intensive care unit (ICU) admission, invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), and death. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) for the outcome. RESULTS: The incidence rate (per 100 person-months) of severe COVID-19 outcomes was the lowest in the MHNW group (0.90), followed by the MHO (1.64), MUNW (3.37), and MUO (3.37) groups. Compared with MHNW, a significantly increased risk of severe COVID-19 was observed in MUNW (HR, 1.41;95% CI, 1.01-1.98) and MUO (HR, 1.77;95% CI, 1.39-2.44) but not in MHO (HR, 1.48;95% CI, 0.98-2.23). The risk of ICU admission or IMV/ECMO was increased only in MUO;however, the risk of death was significantly higher in MUNW and MUO. The risk of severe COVID-19 increased insignificantly by 2% per 1 kg/m2 BMI increase but significantly by 13% per 1 metabolically unhealthy component increase, even after mutually adjusting for BMI and metabolic health status. CONCLUSION: Metabolic health is more important to COVID-19 outcomes than obesity.